Safety and research

Systematic review

SR

Definition

A systematic review uses predefined, transparent methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies that answer a focused question.

Aliases and abbreviations

SR · systematic evidence review · evidence synthesis

Editorial record

Published: August 25, 2026 · Reviewed: August 25, 2026

Expanded definition

Systematic review

A review normally specifies the question, eligibility criteria, search strategy, study-selection process, data extraction, risk-of-bias methods, and synthesis plan before drawing conclusions.

Systematic does not mean flawless or complete. Searches can miss studies, eligibility decisions can introduce bias, included studies may be weak, and outcomes or protocols may be too heterogeneous to combine.

A systematic review may contain a meta-analysis, but it does not have to. Narrative synthesis may be more appropriate when statistical pooling would obscure important differences.

What the term does not establish

Keep the category boundary visible

  • It is not simply an article that cites many studies.
  • It is not automatically a meta-analysis.
  • The review label does not guarantee high-certainty evidence.

Why the distinction matters

Precision changes interpretation

Transparent methods make the evidence base traceable, while critical appraisal prevents the review's conclusion from being treated as stronger than its included studies.

Related terms

Editorial scope

A definition is an entry point, not a product claim

This glossary entry supports general education. It does not diagnose, recommend treatment, or transfer findings from one VNS method, protocol, or device to another.

Back to glossary